The work is complete and committed. Nothing remains that needs a tool call.

Delivered a fixed-supply launch token and a token-gated record registry, with tests, documentation, and a review, committed as surfer77 in a single commit with no attribution trailers.

Contracts

• src/LaunchToken.sol mints the full policy supply to the deployer in a no-argument constructor. It has no owner, mint, burn, pause, or upgrade path.
• src/RecordRegistry.sol stores bytes32 records gated by launch-token balance. Its constructor takes (owner, token, minimumBalance), filled by $owner, $token, and a literal. It rejects a zero owner, a zero or codeless token, and an owner equal to the deployer, so a manifest that resolved the owner to the factory fails at launch instead of shipping dead admin powers.

Verification, all offline and repeated from a fresh clone

Check	Result
forge build	passes
forge test	81 passed, 0 failed
forge fmt --check	passes
forge lint	0 warnings
Protected floor tests against real creation code	8 passed (run in scratch, not committed)
Submodules	none; forge-std v1.9.7 vendored as 33 plain files

Tests cover every permission boundary with success and failure cases, event emission, fuzzing, a stateful invariant suite with a ghost model, and a launch simulation that deploys through a factory-shaped CREATE2 probe and re-runs the floor's supply and forbidden-opcode scans.

Review in docs/REVIEW.md found no fund-loss path. It applied one hardening change, the owner-equals-deployer guard, and documented four design limitations: registrations are front-runnable, the balance gate can be bypassed with flash loans or intra-transaction hand-offs, record transfer is one step, and the owner can seize a key by clearing and re-registering it. The 12-agent audit fan-out could not run because the Agent tool is unavailable in this runtime, so the review is a single-reviewer pass using the same lenses. It is explicitly labeled as the builder's review, not the independent review policy requires.

Open deployment choices are documented in the README: the initial minimumBalance (suggested 100 tokens, owner-adjustable), the policy-supplied $owner, and the compiled-in token name and symbol.

Done. The manifest is written at launch.json, it validates against the accepted implementation, and no other file changed.

What the manifest declares

• Kind evm_project, token LaunchToken with name "Launch Token", symbol "LAUNCH", 18 decimals, no constructor arguments.
• One application contract, RecordRegistry, with constructor arguments ["$owner", "$token", "100000000000000000000"]. That order matches the compiled signature (address owner, address token, uint256 minimumBalance). The literal is 100 tokens in minor units, the value the README and the existing launch test both use.
• Pool paired against native ETH at the zero address, fee 3000, tick spacing 60, initial sqrtPriceX96 for a 1:1 ratio, no hook.
• Notes describing both contracts, every power that $owner receives, the constructor guards, the pool parameters, and the four documented limitations. They are under 3000 characters.

How I checked it

Everything below lived in test/scratch/, which is ignored by git and deleted before submission.

• A validator script parsed the manifest, enforced the task's schema rules, cross-checked every constructor argument against the compiled ABI, resolved the references into real init code, and predicted CREATE2 addresses the way the protected floor does.
• Copies of the two protected test files ran against that derived init code. All 8 floor tests passed, including the supply preservation and forbidden-opcode scans.
• A wiring test deployed from the same init code and confirmed $owner landed in the owner slot, $token in the token slot, and the factory cannot exercise owner powers.
• Negative checks: the validator rejects a reference in a uint slot, the reserved MerkleDistributor name, and a wrong argument count. Swapping $owner and $token passes the static check but makes the registry constructor revert, which the floor and the wiring test both caught.

Final results:

Check	Result
forge build	clean
forge test	90 passed, 0 failed
Files changed vs HEAD	none
New files	launch.json only

Nothing was broadcast and no keys were touched. The manifest is left uncommitted in the working tree, since committing was not requested.

Review complete. No substantiated defects found.

Created .imd-findings.json with an empty findings list. JSON validation, formatting checks, and the full Foundry test suite pass.