Nothing further is needed. The work is complete and verified.

Outcome. The Bazaar marketplace launch is implemented, tested, reviewed, and documented in this repository. All checks pass offline: forge build, forge test (120 tests, 0 failures), and forge fmt --check. I also rehearsed the two protected launch-floor suites against the real creation code using the verifier's environment contract, and all 8 of their tests pass. Nothing was broadcast and nothing was committed, since committing was not asked for and .git/ is off limits. The working tree contains 67 untracked files ready for the submission step, with no submodule markers.

What was built

• src/BazaarToken.sol: fixed supply of 10^27 minor units, 18 decimals, zero-argument constructor minting to the deployer, no admin surface.
• src/Royalties.sol: owner-swappable implementation reached by STATICCALL, with the 0 to 5 percent bound hardcoded and a default of no royalty and no recipient.
• src/BazaarMarketplace.sol: list, buy, global offer, accept offer, and both cancels, with custody, push settlement, a one-block maturity rule, the 0.5 percent fee to $owner, reentrancy guards, delivery checks, and per-collection floor plus 1h/1d/1w rolling averages.
• src/RoyaltyRegistry.sol: optional reference royalty implementation.
• Solady 0.1.26 and forge-std 1.16.1 vendored as plain files under lib/.
• README.md covers architecture, fee flow, oracle windows, events, royalty swapping, deployment parameters, and operational responsibilities. REVIEW.md records the independent review with the threat model, invariants, four fixed findings, two accepted ones, and residual risks.

Deployment parameters for the manifest node

1. Royalties with constructor argument $owner.
2. BazaarMarketplace with $owner and $contract:Royalties.
3. Optionally RoyaltyRegistry with $owner, then $owner calls setImplementation after launch.

Points worth knowing before release. The fee recipient must accept plain ETH or every trade reverts. Only $owner can install a royalty implementation, and a reverting one halts all sales until swapped. The oracle is raw market data rather than a manipulation-resistant price. A separate adversarial review by another contributor is recommended before any funded deployment.

The manifest is written and verified. Nothing else in the tree changed.

Deliverable: launch.json at the repository root, kind evm_project.

• Token: BazaarToken, name Bazaar, symbol BZR, 18 decimals. Zero-argument constructor mints the full supply to its deployer.
• Application contracts, in dependency order:
  1. Royalties with ["$owner"]
  2. BazaarMarketplace with ["$owner", "$contract:Royalties"], where the first argument is the protocol fee recipient
  3. RoyaltyRegistry with ["$owner"], the optional reference royalty implementation that the README and Launch tests already describe as the third launch contract
• Pool: native ETH pair, fee 3000, tick spacing 60, initial sqrtPriceX96 of 2^96.
• Notes: 3,891 characters covering the architecture, fee flow, the hardcoded 0 to 5% royalty bound, oracle windows, privileges granted to $owner, build settings, and operational responsibilities.

Verification performed:

• The full suite passes: 120 tests across 6 suites, and forge build is clean.
• A scratch validator checked the manifest against the compiled ABIs: every constructor is nonpayable, argument counts and types match, references fill only address arguments and point backward, identifiers are unique and under 32 characters, and the notes fit the limit.
• A scratch rehearsal deployed the token and all three contracts through a CREATE2 probe with the manifest's arguments resolved exactly as the factory would, then ran copies of both protected floor suites. All 8 protected tests pass, including the supply check after each constructor and the forbidden-opcode scan.
• git status shows launch.json as the only new file. No tracked file was modified.

I chose to include RoyaltyRegistry because it is present in the accepted tree, covered by the Royalties test suite, and lets $owner enable royalties with two calls instead of a separate hand deployment. Royalties remain off at launch until $owner sets the implementation. The manifest is left uncommitted for the submission process to pick up.

Review complete. Wrote two substantiated findings—one medium and one low—to .imd-findings.json. JSON validation passed; no repository files were modified.