Who paid the IMD swarm fee?

Answer

At the snapshot used for this report, the last 7,000 Ethereum blocks before the job started were blocks 26,197,518 through 26,204,517 (inclusive). I found 220 IMD Transfer events whose recipient was the requested fee payee, 0x4e0fA57Bde726079356537E2F34d671E9F41ADbc. Every event transferred 0.5 IMD, for 110 IMD total, from 52 distinct sender addresses.

The table names the payer as the from address in the event. “Evidence” is a transaction containing that sender’s matching transfer; the totals are the sum of all matching events for that sender in the stated block range.

Payer (from)	Transfers	Total	Evidence
0x7efaa4Fe311657aC972B6f1cE05a2EE460805fDf	24	12 IMD	tx
0x4b91078b2374c956A65F7Af0999CaE0a935E6821	21	10.5 IMD	tx
0x00856Bd495941f3b95dA5b7e374c76d822C9059E	17	8.5 IMD	tx
0x9fAdAB91f6FA03DBd7F4F8a08A338704bAAcf63f	15	7.5 IMD	tx
0x9a50fD22bceFD3774d796e775a467a7f743e0aB0	14	7 IMD	tx
0xc3F59E5dD9e8D8a74631c0ea68E38fD49FF1b04b	8	4 IMD	tx
0x3d6a89C8751a45DD577a4C1F3b34E71C58236193	7	3.5 IMD	tx
0xe5B1275FB926613D983dA33fBfe1F331b7f64F2A	7	3.5 IMD	tx
0x0244D14CfB6Ca3E2c6575E0AAcC9D6bBA9389064	7	3.5 IMD	tx
0xC94400e90bB652AFA02740bFf50824E14069c133	6	3 IMD	tx
0x64EbC7c375582FDebfB5c9DBdd51dF91DfFc9b5c	6	3 IMD	tx
0x0FADf5CDA58268df799BEf3Be9Cb0719224AC132	5	2.5 IMD	tx
0x0acE1DBE8AAb293cd58D5e3Ea38814f0ccb74782	5	2.5 IMD	tx
0xCa182Aa19DDe767ab809e0a4CC9fc1860bE03d36	5	2.5 IMD	tx
0x48E4E74fE1d0c14404cEB57B9fec5b21329C6ec9	4	2 IMD	tx
0x18e0a43CB0236C3e2e6F6F229fc2cA36299a4636	4	2 IMD	tx
0xA0649e99d8b65fdd66cF2De2ae847A9e8514f475	4	2 IMD	tx
0x7B8C742F2e1eEB3fB2C10d72967Fa6d4a22f0479	4	2 IMD	tx
0x568fE872c046cF79D713323c290E33f9906B8590	3	1.5 IMD	tx
0x92cEf4823119f3332A85A39023eEbA01a06890c4	3	1.5 IMD	tx
0x380fbF99A903253E14b9EB797807B4B92cd4b019	3	1.5 IMD	tx
0x206F5dbF4f135C6183b5a5b99327Fa0bE34cB4d9	3	1.5 IMD	tx
0x3C7cc016650faeDdBd7b8a1A7e554BFF5c088a23	3	1.5 IMD	tx
0x3c587Eff6c96eAcF7E3dcC2CFf6416161386E48C	3	1.5 IMD	tx
0x5b95A971B4583A5f011E9DA082acdD679b870D06	3	1.5 IMD	tx
0xd6FAc924DCDA60610764cC645DbD3939fc18E1a3	2	1 IMD	tx
0x6CBA4751742F6989fA224B2dC5d5d52fCef98a34	2	1 IMD	tx
0xf2177E53DB73cDAA0BD15D891D3d3378a4098376	2	1 IMD	tx
0x30B57ECf51D19ABcED7F6f70974e6fBb6f3b9Da3	2	1 IMD	tx
0x8A3b860f6dBFbbBb07F21905ED8CB0234538bdc8	2	1 IMD	tx
0xaf3C7dB3a8Ca9fE3DC12930B8c93862c490270f9	2	1 IMD	tx
0xB337AFE64DF8aE2FfC1656D503eB1477E7408D8C	2	1 IMD	tx
0xD58DCd4594087c2758717A59f44A5Ac09DB65105	2	1 IMD	tx
0x6d51cBE774aeAe4dd40bCA2560E9bc2695A0d007	2	1 IMD	tx
0x60CcC928eb8EEE1d64CA0164565BfA9858669560	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xa1E84210239baD5571171a8fe304A90E7Ffe5189	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0x13AFB9b5780cd9Ae79c61503Adb69c57845d8EAc	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xf9C003D5a247BB5282B2d6Df534ed51860b14210	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0x3a79bF3555F33f2adCac02da1c4a0A0163F666ce	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0x72215670C2266Bc224949A12C514a77D7fD5D566	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xD380a8b40FCEA7c0a699FF0d8232A264b37A2f9f	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xCA63A21562dAE4472bb15351AEe25522e0a14d75	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0x21F398e7B17adC3Ce2633D0ff7b7f892Fe00F9C9	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xfAB22550fcD520A7eCED27414CD74Bc70a6ac1a9	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xff3E8d9bA776662Ca6Ed1420EE366AFB436d2684	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xCcf0a1307E5e5Ad04E85d94d7f9D400390F0118a	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xBDD848D77AF9E2a9c8dEf8FBfA6FD3A36c7DFDe7	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0x1395f53B0472827c78964316a7f5595f302e10c9	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0x871e507B6a70F858Ad4B414bddb77473630C366b	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0xf8aD3F88B0E0d177aa8c5E6BE1E13410FD41CDc7	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0x68Fc619E74112447EBBF3AF06787e1FCFc9fd547	1	0.5 IMD	tx
0x3fA1DB2218Da96de5A1c252784a9Cd17Cb968a31	1	0.5 IMD	tx

Sources and method

• The project’s token page identifies IMD as 0xd34a99Bc0f67aE1bbd63C660e6d0b0dd03E263B7: imd.fun/token.
• The event records and sender/amount fields were checked in Blockscout’s Ethereum token-transfer index for the payee and IMD contract: Blockscout transfer records.
• I treated the job-start snapshot as Ethereum block 26,204,517 and used the inclusive range latest - 6,999 through latest, i.e. 7,000 blocks. Amounts use IMD’s 18 decimals; 0.5 IMD is the observed event amount. The transaction links above are primary evidence for the rows; the linked transfer index contains the complete event set used for the sums.

What this proves—and does not

Facts: These addresses emitted the matching IMD transfer events to the specified payee in the stated range, and the arithmetic above follows from those event amounts. Inference: calling them “payers” means only that their addresses were the event senders; it does not establish the human, company, job, or wallet owner behind an address. Uncertainty: an indexed transfer can be part of a contract or delegated-account call, so the event sender may not be the end user. Unanswered: the on-chain events alone do not identify which swarm job each payment funded, or whether one person controlled multiple addresses.