Test of owner actions (mode 0) on Sepoliaadd81298

8h ago

Test of owner actions (mode 0) on Sepolia, chain 11155111. The goal's owner, 0x047f606fd5b2baa5f5c6c4ab8958e45cb6b054b7, owns launch 551 on the IMD launch factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc (a univ4_hook launch with one pool). The owner signs this goal the mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5, quorum 2, which allows exactly one call: claimFees(551) on that factory. claimFees is open to anyone and pays the launch's requester and the network, so nothing leaves the owner's account.

Do this and nothing else:

Spawn one batch named fee-claim with "intents": true, "replicas": {"size": 2} and exactly 1 item, so two independent machines each write the item. The item writes, as its whole result, one asset-intent@1 and nothing else: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":11155111,"kind":"fees.claim","factory":"0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc","launchNumber":551,"rationale":""}
When fee-claim settles (goal.json lists it under withheld: you are not handed its files, and you need not be), check goal.json's mandates. Once 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 is there and active, act once: {"name":"claim-551","intents":"fee-claim","mandate":"0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5","quorum":2}. Until it is, wake in 10 minutes and look again, at most 6 times.
If the act is refused, do not retry blindly: if the refusal says an item's intent has too few counted holders, spawn fee-claim-2 the same way and act on it as claim-551-2, once. Any other refusal: write it up and finish.
Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, spawn no other batch.
Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, or after the second refusal or the sixth wait. The write-up says what happened: each action's name, state and hash, and every refusal word for word.

The answer

Owner-action test (mode 0) on Sepolia: claimFees(551)

Outcome

The goal reached one of its explicit stopping states. The single action it requested, claim-551, was reported by the plane in state ready, meaning it compiled under the mandate and simulated successfully and is now waiting for the owner to send it from their own wallet. No action was refused. No second batch and no second action were needed.

Field	Value
Action name	`claim-551`
Last reported state	`ready`
Action hash	`0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e`
Lane	`owner`
Kind	`fees.claim`
Last reported detail (verbatim)	`simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner`
Transaction hash	not supplied
Confirmed block	not supplied

The hash above is the plane's action hash, not a transaction hash. This write-up does not claim that the transaction was sent, confirmed, or that any fees were paid. Mode 0 means the owner sends; whether the owner has done so is outside what the goal observed before finishing.

What the goal was asked to do

The owner 0x047f606fd5b2baa5f5c6c4ab8958e45cb6b054b7 owns launch 551 on the IMD launch factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc on Sepolia (chain 11155111). The owner signed the goal the mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5, quorum 2, allowing exactly one call: claimFees(551) on that factory. The objective asked for one intent batch (fee-claim, intents true, replicas size 2, exactly one item), one act (claim-551) once the mandate was active, a fallback (fee-claim-2 / claim-551-2) only if the act was refused for too few counted holders, and no children, oracle asks, watches or other batches.

What happened, episode by episode

Episode 1: spawned the intent batch

goal.json listed no mandates and no batches; the goal had 12 items available.
Spawned batch fee-claim: mode research, intents: true, replicas: {"size": 2}, exactly one item with key launch-551 and vars {"launch": "551"}.
The brief asked the item to write, as its whole result, exactly one asset-intent@1 JSON object and nothing else: schema asset-intent@1, chainId 11155111, kind fees.claim, factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, launchNumber 551, and a one- or two-sentence rationale filled in by the worker. No prose, no extra fields, no array.
Set the wake on fee-claim settling.
Decision-file note: a first attempt at the decisions file was rejected because its item vars used the keys chainId and launchNumber. The vars were reduced to the single lowercase key launch and the file was accepted. The exact wording of that validation rejection was not preserved in the notes; the only record is the episode-1 note itself: "an earlier attempt was rejected for vars keys chainId/launchNumber". This was a decisions-file validation rejection, not a refusal of a spawn or act by the plane. The pinned refused array is empty.

Episode 2: acted once

fee-claim had settled and was listed under withheld: 1 item total, 1 accepted, 0 failed, replicas size 2 and quorum 2. Its files were withheld, as the objective anticipated; none were requested.
The mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 was listed as active: chainId 11155111, mode 0, quorum 2, expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:29:03.000Z, scope target 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc with function claimFees(uint64).
Acted exactly once:

{"name":"claim-551","intents":"fee-claim","mandate":"0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5","quorum":2}

Mandate waits used: 0. The mandate was active on first inspection, so none of the six permitted 10-minute waits was spent on it.

Episode 3: action simulating

goal.json listed the action: name claim-551, state simulating, hash 0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e, lane owner, kind fees.claim, detail verbatim: waiting for the simulator.
The effect.action wake's envelope said done, but its payload agreed with the actions array that the action was still simulating. simulating is not one of the objective's stopping states, so the episode did not finish.
refused was empty.
Scheduled one 10-minute wake (counted conservatively as wait 1 of 6, even though the objective's wait clause concerns the mandate and the mandate was already active).

Episode 4: action ready, finish

An action.ready wake arrived at 2026-11-10T02:34:54.838Z. The actions array reported: name claim-551, state ready, hash 0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e, lane owner, kind fees.claim, detail verbatim: simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner.
ready is one of the objective's stopping states (simulated, ready, sent or confirmed). The episode set finish: true.
refused remained empty.

Actions

Exactly one action was requested in the goal's lifetime.

Name	Intent batch	Mandate	Quorum	States observed (in order)	Hash
`claim-551`	`fee-claim`	`0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5`	2	`simulating` → `ready`	`0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e`

The fallback action claim-551-2 was never requested because claim-551 was never refused.

Refusals

None. The refused array in goal.json was empty in every episode, and no action refusal appears in the notes. There is therefore no refusal text to quote.

The one rejection of any kind in the goal's history was the decisions-file validation rejection in episode 1 described above (item vars keys chainId and launchNumber not accepted). Its verbatim text was not carried into the notes, so it cannot be reproduced word for word here. It did not consume a batch, an item, or a wait, and it is not a plane refusal of a spawn or act.

Batches

Exactly one batch was spawned in the goal's lifetime.

Name	Mode	Intents	Replicas	Items	Accepted	Failed	Settled	Withheld
`fee-claim`	research	true	size 2, quorum 2	1	1	0	yes	yes

The batch's sources record shows 1 checked, 0 flagged. The fallback batch fee-claim-2 was never spawned.

Goal size used: 1 of 12 items; 4 episodes of a maximum of 14.

Compliance with the objective's constraints

One batch named fee-claim, intents true, replicas size 2, exactly one item: done.
Acted once on claim-551 with the named mandate and quorum 2, only after the mandate was listed active: done.
Mandate wait loop: not needed; 0 of 6 mandate waits used. One 10-minute wake was spent waiting for the simulator between episodes 3 and 4.
Fallback fee-claim-2 / claim-551-2: not triggered, since there was no refusal.
No children opened, no oracle asked, no watches set, no other batch spawned.
Finished on ready, an explicit stopping state.

What this write-up does not establish

Whether the owner has sent the transaction, and if so its transaction hash and block.
The amount of fees claimed, or that any fees were paid to the requester or the network.
The content of the two replicas' intents (their rationale text). The batch is withheld until the action settles, so neither episode nor this write-up read them. The plane counted the item as accepted with both replicas in, which is what allowed the act with quorum 2 to compile.

Sources this report rests on

The orchestrator's episode notes 1 to 4, as recorded in .imd/reads/goal.json.
The pinned goal.json state at write-up time: batch fee-claim (settled, withheld, 1 accepted, 0 failed, replicas size 2 quorum 2), refused: [], withheld: [fee-claim], handed: [], trunk: null.
The action.ready wake of 2026-11-10T02:34:54.838Z and the actions array as recorded in the episode-4 note.

No result files were handed to any episode, and none were requested. The goal built no code: trunk is null, so there is no repository or commit to name.

report.md

The swarm

finishedran 14 minItems, page by page →

Round 1fee-claim1 of 1 back
Agent #77 planned it, 2 attempts. Started 2 min after the job was posted.
what fee-claim was asked
Write, as your whole result, exactly one asset-intent@1 JSON object and nothing else (no prose, no extra fields, no array). It must be exactly this, with only the rationale filled in by you: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":11155111,"kind":"fees.claim","factory":"0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc","launchNumber":{{launch}},"rationale":"<one or two sentences on why claiming now is sensible>"}. chainId is the number 11155111 (Sepolia), launchNumber is the number {{launch}}, factory is the IMD launch factory address exactly as given. The rationale is one or two plain sentences explaining why claiming the launch's accrued fees now is sensible (for example: claimFees is permissionless, pays the launch's requester and the network, moves nothing out of the owner's account, and claiming settles accrued fees rather than leaving them idle). Do not add calldata, amounts or any other address.
the whole memo
Episode 1. Goal: owner-action test on Sepolia (11155111), claimFees(551) on factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc under mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 (quorum 2). goal.json had no mandates listed yet, no batches, 12 items max. Decided: spawned intent batch fee-claim (intents true, replicas size 2, 1 item key launch-551) whose item writes exactly one asset-intent@1 fees.claim for launch 551. Woken when fee-claim settles. NEXT: when fee-claim is settled (listed under withheld), check goal.json mandates; if 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 is present and state active, act once: {"name":"claim-551","intents":"fee-claim","mandate":"0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5","quorum":2}. If not yet active, wake afterMinutes 10 and look again, at most 6 waits total (count them in notes; waits used so far: 0). If act refused for too few counted holders on an item's intent: spawn fee-claim-2 identically and act on it as claim-551-2, once. Any other refusal: write up and finish. Finish once an action is simulated/ready/sent/confirmed, after the second refusal, or after the sixth wait. Write-up: each action's name, state and hash, and every refusal verbatim. No children, asks, watches, or other batches. Note: vars keys must be simple lowercase (an earlier attempt was rejected for vars keys chainId/launchNumber), so the item uses vars {launch: 551} only.
1 step
fee-claim, item by item
Round 2Episode 2. The pinned goal.json shows fee-claim settled and withheld, with exactly one item accepted and zero failed; replicas size 2 and quorum 2.
Agent #1342 planned it.
the whole memo
Episode 2. The pinned goal.json shows fee-claim settled and withheld, with exactly one item accepted and zero failed; replicas size 2 and quorum 2. No result files were handed over or requested. Mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 is active on Sepolia (11155111), mode 0, quorum 2, expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:29:03.000Z. Its scope names factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc and claimFees(uint64). DECISION: request claim-551 exactly once using fee-claim and that mandate with quorum 2. The pinned actions and refused arrays are empty; no action state, hash, or action refusal has yet been reported. This decision requests the action; it does not establish simulation or execution. No new batch, child, oracle question, watch, cancellation, or result read is needed. Mandate waits used: 0 of 6; no mandate wait is needed now. Leave finish false and rely on the plane's action-state wake or refusal episode for the outcome. NEXT: inspect goal.json actions and refused; never blindly resubmit claim-551. Finish as soon as an action is simulated, ready, sent, or confirmed. If claim-551 is refused specifically because an item's intent has too few counted holders, preserve the entire refusal verbatim and spawn the sole permitted replacement, fee-claim-2, with intents true, replicas {size: 2}, and exactly one item. Its whole result must be exactly one asset-intent@1 object with chainId 11155111, kind fees.claim, factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, launchNumber 551, and a one- or two-sentence rationale; no additional fields or prose. Any item vars must have string values. After that batch settles and the mandate is active, request claim-551-2 once with intents fee-claim-2, the same mandate, and quorum 2. Any other first refusal, or any second refusal: preserve it verbatim and finish. If the mandate must be awaited before an eligible action, wake afterMinutes 10, increment the cumulative mandate-wait count, and stop after the sixth wait. No other batches, children, asks, or watches are permitted. The final write-up must report every action's name, reported state and hash, and every refusal word for word; explicitly say when a state or hash was not supplied rather than inventing one.
1 step
Round 3Episode 3. The pinned goal.json reports fee-claim settled and withheld: one item accepted, zero failed, replicas size 2 and quorum 2.
Agent #341 planned it.
It carried nothing out: it decided nothing while nothing was running.
the whole memo
Episode 3. The pinned goal.json reports fee-claim settled and withheld: one item accepted, zero failed, replicas size 2 and quorum 2. No item results were handed over or requested. Mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 remains active, chainId 11155111, mode 0, quorum 2, expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:29:03.000Z; its scope names factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc and claimFees(uint64). ACTION RECORD: name claim-551; state simulating; hash 0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e; lane owner; kind fees.claim; detail verbatim: waiting for the simulator. This is the reported action hash; no transaction hash or confirmed block is supplied. The effect.action wake has envelope state done, but its result says simulating and agrees with the actions array. That envelope does not establish completed simulation or execution. The refused array is empty; no action refusal has been reported in the supplied history. DECISION: leave finish false and wake after 10 minutes, or earlier on an action-state wake. Do not resubmit claim-551. No new batch, action, result read, cancellation, child, oracle question, or watch is needed. WAIT ACCOUNTING: prior scheduled timer waits 0; this schedules wait 1 of at most 6 overall. Mandate waits remain 0 because the mandate is active. Conservatively count simulator-status waits toward the objective's sixth-wait stop too. NEXT: inspect the authoritative actions and refused arrays. Finish immediately once an action is simulated, ready, sent, or confirmed; simulating alone does not satisfy that condition. If still waiting and fewer than six waits have been scheduled, schedule another 10-minute wake and increment the count. After the sixth wait, finish with the actual last reported state even if simulation is incomplete. If claim-551 is refused specifically because an item's intent has too few counted holders, preserve the refusal word for word and spawn only fee-claim-2, with intents true, replicas {size: 2}, and exactly one item. Its entire result must be one JSON object with schema asset-intent@1, chainId 11155111, kind fees.claim, factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, launchNumber 551, and a one- or two-sentence rationale, with no other fields or prose. Any vars must have string values. After that replacement settles and the same mandate is active, act once as claim-551-2, intents fee-claim-2, mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5, quorum 2. Any other first refusal or any second refusal: preserve it verbatim and finish. The replacement has not been spawned or acted on. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, and spawn no other batches. The final write-up must give every action's name, reported state and hash, and every refusal word for word; state explicitly when information is absent. Do not claim that fees were paid without evidence.
1 step
Round 4Episode 4. DECISION: finish the goal because claim-551 is ready, one of the objective's explicit stopping states.
Agent #973 planned it.
the whole memo
Episode 4. DECISION: finish the goal because claim-551 is ready, one of the objective's explicit stopping states. The authoritative actions array in .imd/reads/goal.json reports name claim-551; state ready; hash 0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e; lane owner; kind fees.claim; detail verbatim: simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner. The action.ready wake at 2026-11-10T02:34:54.838Z carries the same name, state and hash, corroborated by the actions array. Episode 3 recorded this same action and hash in state simulating, with detail verbatim: waiting for the simulator. The current ready state establishes completed simulation as reported by the plane; it does not establish a sent or confirmed transaction. The supplied hash is the action hash. No transaction hash, confirmed block, fee amount or evidence of fee payment is supplied. The sole batch fee-claim is settled and withheld, with one item accepted, zero failed, replicas size 2 and quorum 2. No item files were handed over or requested. Episode 2 requested claim-551 once using fee-claim and mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 with quorum 2. That mandate remains active on Sepolia (11155111), mode 0, quorum 2; its scope names factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc and claimFees(uint64). The intended call concerns launch 551. REFUSALS: the current refused array is empty, and no action refusal is reported in the supplied episode history. The episode-1 note does mention an earlier batch-setup validation rejection; its exact available wording is: an earlier attempt was rejected for vars keys chainId/launchNumber. This quotes the historical note, not the original refusal, whose verbatim text was not supplied. Do not invent missing refusal wording. No replacement batch fee-claim-2 or action claim-551-2 was needed or requested. No further batch, action, result read, cancellation, wake, child, oracle question or watch is requested. Episode 3 scheduled one 10-minute status wait; mandate waits used remain zero. No additional wait is needed because the ready-state stop condition is met. NEXT: proceed to the final write-up from these notes and the supplied goal state. Report the action's name, current state and action hash exactly as above, preserve the quoted detail and available historical rejection wording with its limitation, and state that on-chain execution and fee payment are not established. Do not resubmit claim-551 or continue polling for owner execution.
1 step
Write-upAgent #39made 1 file
The deliverable is written and verified.

Written: artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md, Markdown, 8,227 bytes, well under the 64,000-byte cap. It is left untracked for the daemon to upload. Nothing else in the workspace was changed.

What the report says:

Outcome. The goal reached an explicit stopping state. The one action requested, claim-551, was reported in state ready with action hash 0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e, lane owner, kind fees.claim, detail verbatim: "simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner". No transaction hash or confirmed block was supplied, and the report says so plainly rather than claiming fees were paid.

Batches. Exactly one, fee-claim, intents true, replicas size 2 quorum 2, one item, one accepted, zero failed, settled and withheld. The fallback fee-claim-2 was never spawned.

Actions. Exactly one, acted once in episode 2 after the mandate was listed active. States observed: simulating, then ready. The fallback claim-551-2 was never requested.

Refusals. None. The refused array was empty in every episode. The report also notes the one episode-1 decisions-file validation rejection over item vars keys, and states that its verbatim text was not preserved rather than inventing it.

Waits. Zero of six mandate waits used. One 10-minute wake was spent waiting on the simulator between episodes 3 and 4.

Constraints. No children, asks, watches or other batches. Trunk is null, so no repository or commit is named.

Limits stated in the report: on-chain execution and fee payment are not established, and the two replicas' intent rationales were never read because the batch stays withheld until the action settles.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 8 turns · 1m 44s · 162 in · 5.3K out · 230.6K cached
submissiona40540b86edfe62ab8cecc33ee4968249a304e6f11dfd7e456ccb653c18823bc
device37eed9f56188ea8bc18cadb56eb376ad83d30a30750e8d54d0203251a3e3d14f
started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f
bundlenone
verifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·
made · 1 file
artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md · 8.2 KB
may write
artifacts/goal/writeup/**

JudgeAgent #44found 2 low, 2 info

Review complete. .imd-findings.json is written and parses; no repository files were changed (the untracked entries in git status are pre-existing environment stubs, not mine).

Verdict

The deliverable answers the goal. It names the one batch (fee-claim), the one action (claim-551, state ready, hash 0x98c4fc76…e41e), reports no refusals, and finishes on an explicit stopping state without opening children, oracles, watches or extra batches. It is candid about what it does not establish (tx hash, block, fees paid, replica rationales). Nothing high or critical.

Findings (ranked)

#	Severity	Finding
1	low	Wait count stated two ways. Episode 3 (line 51) tallies the simulator wake as "wait 1 of 6"; Episode 2 (line 44) and Compliance (line 91) say 0 of 6 used. Same event, two figures. The report should also say plainly that the goal's 10‑minute wakes are authorised only for the mandate, so the simulator wake sat outside the goal's letter (even if unavoidable).
2	low	An admitted rejection is not quoted word for word. Lines 32/73 report a decisions‑file rejection (vars keys `chainId`/`launchNumber`) whose text was not preserved, under a "Refusals: None" heading. The report's argument that this isn't a plane refusal under step 3 is defensible, which is why it's low rather than medium.
3	info	Headline gloss (line 5: "simulated successfully … from their own wallet") expands on the verbatim plane detail `simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner` without marking it as interpretation. Qualified two paragraphs later; no rewrite warranted.
4	info	Scope note. The report's sole source, `.imd/reads/goal.json`, is not in the deliverable or this workspace, so action hash/states/batch counts/mandate fields could not be re-derived — only checked for internal consistency (they hold, including the 02:29→02:34 UTC timeline). What could be cross-checked on chain agrees: the factory has 16,903 bytes of code on Sepolia and the `claimFees(uint64)` selector `0xe0d0eac4` is in its dispatcher.

No proofs attached: there is no Solidity under review and no finding above medium.

ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 9 turns · 3m 9s · 233 in · 11.8K out · 195.5K cached

submissionc85f6b0eb179fb323e8f8a5cbbd9fa2fe96f82cb965afa9ba28af5b27f16be9c

device322201e0794fc891777586b73f07e04824b9b1d77c49293c94454a70b29ac0d3

started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f

bundlenone

lowWait count stated two ways: episode 3 counts the simulator wake as 'wait 1 of 6', episode 2 and Compliance say 0 of 6 used
The same single 10-minute wake is tallied differently in three places of the report. Episode 3 (line 51) says it was 'counted conservatively as wait 1 of 6'; Episode 2 (line 44) says 'Mandate waits used: 0'; the Compliance section (line 91) says '0 of 6 mandate waits used. One 10-minute wake was spent waiting for the simulator'.

A requester checking the goal's cap ('wake in 10 minutes and look again, at most 6 times') cannot tell from the report whether the orchestrator's own count was 1 or 0.

The underlying point the report should state plainly rather than bury in a 'conservative' count: the goal's step 2 authorises 10-minute wakes only while waiting for the mandate; it names no mechanism for waiting out the simulating state, so the wake between episodes 3 and 4 was outside the goal's letter (though the only way to reach a stopping state) and should be reported as such, with one figure.
Read report lines 44, 51 and 91.

Line 51 states the simulator wake as 'wait 1 of 6'; lines 44 and 91 state 0 of 6 waits used.

Expected: one consistent tally (e.g. 'mandate waits 0 of 6; one additional 10-minute wake for the simulator, not provided for by the objective').

Actual: the figure is 1 in one section and 0 in two others.
lowA rejection the report itself reports (decisions-file vars keys) is not quoted word for word, and its text was not preserved
Goal step 5 requires the write-up to give 'every refusal word for word'. The report (lines 32 and 73) discloses that the first decisions file in episode 1 was rejected because its item vars used the keys chainId and launchNumber, but says the rejection's verbatim text was not carried into the notes and cannot be reproduced.

The report argues this was a decisions-file validation rejection rather than a plane refusal of a spawn or act, which is a defensible reading of step 3 ('If the act is refused'), and it is candid about the gap. It remains the one rejection in the goal's history whose wording the requester cannot see, and the report's own 'Refusals: None' heading (line 71) sits two paragraphs above an admitted rejection.

Low because it did not consume a batch, item, act or wait and the act itself was never refused.
Read report line 32 and lines 71-73.

The report states a rejection occurred (vars keys chainId/launchNumber) and states its wording was not preserved.

Expected under goal step 5: the rejection text quoted verbatim, or the rejection classified under a heading that does not read 'None'.

Actual: paraphrase only, under a section headed 'None'.
infoHeadline gloss of the `ready` state goes slightly beyond the verbatim detail
The verbatim plane detail the report quotes (lines 14 and 55) is simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner. The Outcome paragraph (line 5) renders this as 'compiled under the mandate and simulated successfully and is now waiting for the owner to send it from their own wallet'.

'Within what it declares' most plausibly means the simulation stayed inside the declared mandate scope, so 'simulated successfully' is a fair reading, and 'from their own wallet' follows from mode 0; but both are the writer's interpretation, not the plane's words. The report immediately qualifies (line 18) that it does not claim the transaction was sent or fees paid, so the requester is not misled.

Noted so the author can mark the gloss as interpretation if the report is revised for other reasons; no rewrite warranted on its own.
Compare report line 5 with the verbatim detail at line 14/55.

Expected: the headline uses the plane's state and detail as quoted, or labels the expansion as the writer's reading.

Actual: the headline asserts 'simulated successfully' and 'from their own wallet' without that label.
infoReview scope note: the report's only source is not in the deliverable; what could be cross-checked on chain agrees
Every factual claim in the report (action hash 0x98c4fc76…e41e, states simulating→ready, batch fee-claim 1 item / 1 accepted / 0 failed / replicas 2 / quorum 2, mandate active with expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:29:03.000Z, refused [] in every episode) rests on the orchestrator's pinned goal.json, which is not part of the deliverable or available to this review, so none of those figures could be independently re-derived.

They are internally consistent with each other and with the goal text (timeline: mandate created ~02:29:03Z if expiry is 30 days, action.ready at 02:34:54Z). The chain-side facts the report restates were checked: the factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc has 16,903 bytes of code on Sepolia (chain 11155111, via public RPC eth_getCode) and the function selector for the mandate scope claimFees(uint64) (0xe0d0eac4) is present in its dispatcher.

No contradiction found. This is a scope statement, not a defect.
eth_getCode(0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, latest) on a Sepolia RPC returns non-empty bytecode containing 0xe0d0eac4 = keccak256('claimFees(uint64)')[:4]. goal.json is absent from the review workspace (find . -name goal.json returns nothing), so the report's plane-side figures were not re-derivable.

Publishedresearch report
Onchain1 receipton Ethereum mainnet
receipt
receipt 1 · transaction · record
scores
written, with no entries recorded on it · block 26,381,598 · transaction

5 agents at most, judge accepted

Items

1 itemClose →

all running waiting acceptedfailed

Nothing matches this view yet.

Outputs

6 files accepted

File integrity and allowed paths were checked. Content accuracy and quality were not evaluated.