Owner-action test (mode 0) on Sepolia: claimFees(551)

1. Round 1fee-claim1 of 1 back

   Agent #77 planned it, 2 attempts. Started 2 min after the job was posted.

   what fee-claim was asked

   Write, as your whole result, exactly one asset-intent@1 JSON object and nothing else (no prose, no extra fields, no array). It must be exactly this, with only the rationale filled in by you: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":11155111,"kind":"fees.claim","factory":"0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc","launchNumber":{{launch}},"rationale":"<one or two sentences on why claiming now is sensible>"}. chainId is the number 11155111 (Sepolia), launchNumber is the number {{launch}}, factory is the IMD launch factory address exactly as given. The rationale is one or two plain sentences explaining why claiming the launch's accrued fees now is sensible (for example: claimFees is permissionless, pays the launch's requester and the network, moves nothing out of the owner's account, and claiming settles accrued fees rather than leaving them idle). Do not add calldata, amounts or any other address.

   the whole memo

   Episode 1. Goal: owner-action test on Sepolia (11155111), claimFees(551) on factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc under mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 (quorum 2). goal.json had no mandates listed yet, no batches, 12 items max. Decided: spawned intent batch fee-claim (intents true, replicas size 2, 1 item key launch-551) whose item writes exactly one asset-intent@1 fees.claim for launch 551. Woken when fee-claim settles. NEXT: when fee-claim is settled (listed under withheld), check goal.json mandates; if 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 is present and state active, act once: {"name":"claim-551","intents":"fee-claim","mandate":"0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5","quorum":2}. If not yet active, wake afterMinutes 10 and look again, at most 6 waits total (count them in notes; waits used so far: 0). If act refused for too few counted holders on an item's intent: spawn fee-claim-2 identically and act on it as claim-551-2, once. Any other refusal: write up and finish. Finish once an action is simulated/ready/sent/confirmed, after the second refusal, or after the sixth wait. Write-up: each action's name, state and hash, and every refusal verbatim. No children, asks, watches, or other batches. Note: vars keys must be simple lowercase (an earlier attempt was rejected for vars keys chainId/launchNumber), so the item uses vars {launch: 551} only.

   1 step

   1. Orchestrate 001Agent #77made 1 file2 attempts

      #785Claudeinvalid output

      Episode 1 decisions are written and validated.

      What I did

      • Wrote artifacts/goal/episodes/001/decisions.json as one JSON object in the reference shape, left untracked for the daemon to upload.
      • It spawns exactly one batch, fee-claim, with intents enabled, replicas of size 2, and one item keyed claim-551. The brief tells each holder to write exactly one asset-intent@1 for a fees.claim on launch 551 at the named factory on chain 11155111, with a rationale in their own words and no other fields, calldata, or addresses.
      • It spawns nothing else, opens no children, asks no oracle, sets no watches, and acts on nothing yet, since goal.json lists no mandate and the batch has not run.
      • The wake fires when fee-claim settles, or after 30 minutes as a fallback, since intent items may wait for a free counted holder.

      Checks run

      The file parses as a single object with only allowed keys. The filled brief is 1,478 characters, within the 3,000 limit, and the notes are 2,917 characters. The intent template embedded in the brief parses and carries the exact chainId, kind, factory and launchNumber the objective gives.

      Notes for the next episode

      The notes spell out the full remaining plan step by step: wait for fee-claim to settle without counting that as a mandate wait, then act once as claim-551 when the mandate is active, wake every 10 minutes up to six times if it is not, spawn fee-claim-2 and act once as claim-551-2 only on a too-few-holders refusal, and finish with every refusal quoted verbatim in any other case. Counters for mandate waits, actions taken and refusals start at zero.

      ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 7 turns · 1m 32s · 130 in · 5.2K out · 172.4K cached

      submissioned7d3bc02baa791409cb030ab1af914cc0d3216061fe8cd0add2987db3da4a60

      device48cf2e19b6c5438694ce408bdf284342cd2d56a53719317bf19c016febaa01cd

      started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f

      bundlenone

      made · 1 file

      artifacts/goal/episodes/001/decisions.json · 5 KB

      #77Claudemade 1 file

      I wrote the decisions file for episode 1 at artifacts/goal/episodes/001/decisions.json. It is valid JSON in the shape the reference gives. I only checked that it parses; whether the plane accepts it will show next episode.

      What it decides:

      • Spawns one batch, fee-claim, with "intents": true, "replicas": {"size": 2}, JSON output and exactly one item (launch-551). The brief tells the item to write, as its whole result, only the exact asset-intent@1 from the objective (fees.claim, chain 11155111, the factory address, launch 551). The worker fills in just the rationale and adds no calldata, amounts or other addresses.
      • Fixes the earlier rejection: that attempt failed because vars had the keys chainId and launchNumber. This item's vars are only {"launch": "551"}, which fills a {{launch}} placeholder in the brief. The fixed values are written straight into the brief.
      • Wakes when fee-claim settles, with 120 minutes as a fallback.
      • Does not finish the goal. It opens no children, asks no oracle and sets no watches.

      Not acted on yet: goal.json lists no mandates so far, so there was nothing to act under this episode.

      The notes carry the plan for the next episodes:

      1. Once fee-claim is settled and the mandate shows as active, act once as claim-551.
      2. Until then, look again every 10 minutes, at most 6 times (0 used so far).
      3. If the act is refused because an item's intent has too few counted holders, spawn fee-claim-2 the same way and act on it once as claim-551-2. Any other refusal gets written up and the goal finishes.
      4. Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, after the second refusal, or after the sixth wait. The write-up gives each action's name, state and hash, and every refusal word for word.

      ran onclaude · claude-opus-5-5 · 3 turns · 28s · 6 in · 2.4K out · 76.2K cached

      submissiondf22da8ddb5279933cff82de6dc2d0693210f330bca28ce71fb70b923bc0fa41

      device234a4a00ca903cb96c721a93c0738c5800f5fda1e2fd5d740b5453478ce9f573

      started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f

      bundlenone

      verifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·

      made · 1 file

      artifacts/goal/episodes/001/decisions.json · 2.8 KB

      may write

      artifacts/goal/episodes/001/**

   fee-claim, item by item

2. Round 2Episode 2. The pinned goal.json shows fee-claim settled and withheld, with exactly one item accepted and zero failed; replicas size 2 and quorum 2.

   Agent #1342 planned it.

   the whole memo

   Episode 2. The pinned goal.json shows fee-claim settled and withheld, with exactly one item accepted and zero failed; replicas size 2 and quorum 2. No result files were handed over or requested. Mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 is active on Sepolia (11155111), mode 0, quorum 2, expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:29:03.000Z. Its scope names factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc and claimFees(uint64). DECISION: request claim-551 exactly once using fee-claim and that mandate with quorum 2. The pinned actions and refused arrays are empty; no action state, hash, or action refusal has yet been reported. This decision requests the action; it does not establish simulation or execution. No new batch, child, oracle question, watch, cancellation, or result read is needed. Mandate waits used: 0 of 6; no mandate wait is needed now. Leave finish false and rely on the plane's action-state wake or refusal episode for the outcome. NEXT: inspect goal.json actions and refused; never blindly resubmit claim-551. Finish as soon as an action is simulated, ready, sent, or confirmed. If claim-551 is refused specifically because an item's intent has too few counted holders, preserve the entire refusal verbatim and spawn the sole permitted replacement, fee-claim-2, with intents true, replicas {size: 2}, and exactly one item. Its whole result must be exactly one asset-intent@1 object with chainId 11155111, kind fees.claim, factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, launchNumber 551, and a one- or two-sentence rationale; no additional fields or prose. Any item vars must have string values. After that batch settles and the mandate is active, request claim-551-2 once with intents fee-claim-2, the same mandate, and quorum 2. Any other first refusal, or any second refusal: preserve it verbatim and finish. If the mandate must be awaited before an eligible action, wake afterMinutes 10, increment the cumulative mandate-wait count, and stop after the sixth wait. No other batches, children, asks, or watches are permitted. The final write-up must report every action's name, reported state and hash, and every refusal word for word; explicitly say when a state or hash was not supplied rather than inventing one.

   1 step

3. Round 3Episode 3. The pinned goal.json reports fee-claim settled and withheld: one item accepted, zero failed, replicas size 2 and quorum 2.

   Agent #341 planned it.

   It carried nothing out: it decided nothing while nothing was running.

   the whole memo

   Episode 3. The pinned goal.json reports fee-claim settled and withheld: one item accepted, zero failed, replicas size 2 and quorum 2. No item results were handed over or requested. Mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 remains active, chainId 11155111, mode 0, quorum 2, expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:29:03.000Z; its scope names factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc and claimFees(uint64). ACTION RECORD: name claim-551; state simulating; hash 0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e; lane owner; kind fees.claim; detail verbatim: waiting for the simulator. This is the reported action hash; no transaction hash or confirmed block is supplied. The effect.action wake has envelope state done, but its result says simulating and agrees with the actions array. That envelope does not establish completed simulation or execution. The refused array is empty; no action refusal has been reported in the supplied history. DECISION: leave finish false and wake after 10 minutes, or earlier on an action-state wake. Do not resubmit claim-551. No new batch, action, result read, cancellation, child, oracle question, or watch is needed. WAIT ACCOUNTING: prior scheduled timer waits 0; this schedules wait 1 of at most 6 overall. Mandate waits remain 0 because the mandate is active. Conservatively count simulator-status waits toward the objective's sixth-wait stop too. NEXT: inspect the authoritative actions and refused arrays. Finish immediately once an action is simulated, ready, sent, or confirmed; simulating alone does not satisfy that condition. If still waiting and fewer than six waits have been scheduled, schedule another 10-minute wake and increment the count. After the sixth wait, finish with the actual last reported state even if simulation is incomplete. If claim-551 is refused specifically because an item's intent has too few counted holders, preserve the refusal word for word and spawn only fee-claim-2, with intents true, replicas {size: 2}, and exactly one item. Its entire result must be one JSON object with schema asset-intent@1, chainId 11155111, kind fees.claim, factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, launchNumber 551, and a one- or two-sentence rationale, with no other fields or prose. Any vars must have string values. After that replacement settles and the same mandate is active, act once as claim-551-2, intents fee-claim-2, mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5, quorum 2. Any other first refusal or any second refusal: preserve it verbatim and finish. The replacement has not been spawned or acted on. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, and spawn no other batches. The final write-up must give every action's name, reported state and hash, and every refusal word for word; state explicitly when information is absent. Do not claim that fees were paid without evidence.

   1 step

4. Round 4Episode 4. DECISION: finish the goal because claim-551 is ready, one of the objective's explicit stopping states.

   Agent #973 planned it.

   the whole memo

   Episode 4. DECISION: finish the goal because claim-551 is ready, one of the objective's explicit stopping states. The authoritative actions array in .imd/reads/goal.json reports name claim-551; state ready; hash 0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e; lane owner; kind fees.claim; detail verbatim: simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner. The action.ready wake at 2026-11-10T02:34:54.838Z carries the same name, state and hash, corroborated by the actions array. Episode 3 recorded this same action and hash in state simulating, with detail verbatim: waiting for the simulator. The current ready state establishes completed simulation as reported by the plane; it does not establish a sent or confirmed transaction. The supplied hash is the action hash. No transaction hash, confirmed block, fee amount or evidence of fee payment is supplied. The sole batch fee-claim is settled and withheld, with one item accepted, zero failed, replicas size 2 and quorum 2. No item files were handed over or requested. Episode 2 requested claim-551 once using fee-claim and mandate 0x1acc5602dcc5ae9485c7138f12516734b22247374ce53ca54ed4cbcbcac628a5 with quorum 2. That mandate remains active on Sepolia (11155111), mode 0, quorum 2; its scope names factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc and claimFees(uint64). The intended call concerns launch 551. REFUSALS: the current refused array is empty, and no action refusal is reported in the supplied episode history. The episode-1 note does mention an earlier batch-setup validation rejection; its exact available wording is: an earlier attempt was rejected for vars keys chainId/launchNumber. This quotes the historical note, not the original refusal, whose verbatim text was not supplied. Do not invent missing refusal wording. No replacement batch fee-claim-2 or action claim-551-2 was needed or requested. No further batch, action, result read, cancellation, wake, child, oracle question or watch is requested. Episode 3 scheduled one 10-minute status wait; mandate waits used remain zero. No additional wait is needed because the ready-state stop condition is met. NEXT: proceed to the final write-up from these notes and the supplied goal state. Report the action's name, current state and action hash exactly as above, preserve the quoted detail and available historical rejection wording with its limitation, and state that on-chain execution and fee payment are not established. Do not resubmit claim-551 or continue polling for owner execution.

   1 step

5. Write-upAgent #39made 1 file

   The deliverable is written and verified.

   Written: artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md, Markdown, 8,227 bytes, well under the 64,000-byte cap. It is left untracked for the daemon to upload. Nothing else in the workspace was changed.

   What the report says:

   • Outcome. The goal reached an explicit stopping state. The one action requested, claim-551, was reported in state ready with action hash 0x98c4fc7608c95be3078c052905ff842a46bed4a14aa81ca3af7b356c8ef7e41e, lane owner, kind fees.claim, detail verbatim: "simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner". No transaction hash or confirmed block was supplied, and the report says so plainly rather than claiming fees were paid.
   • Batches. Exactly one, fee-claim, intents true, replicas size 2 quorum 2, one item, one accepted, zero failed, settled and withheld. The fallback fee-claim-2 was never spawned.
   • Actions. Exactly one, acted once in episode 2 after the mandate was listed active. States observed: simulating, then ready. The fallback claim-551-2 was never requested.
   • Refusals. None. The refused array was empty in every episode. The report also notes the one episode-1 decisions-file validation rejection over item vars keys, and states that its verbatim text was not preserved rather than inventing it.
   • Waits. Zero of six mandate waits used. One 10-minute wake was spent waiting on the simulator between episodes 3 and 4.
   • Constraints. No children, asks, watches or other batches. Trunk is null, so no repository or commit is named.

   Limits stated in the report: on-chain execution and fee payment are not established, and the two replicas' intent rationales were never read because the batch stays withheld until the action settles.

   ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 8 turns · 1m 44s · 162 in · 5.3K out · 230.6K cached

   submissiona40540b86edfe62ab8cecc33ee4968249a304e6f11dfd7e456ccb653c18823bc

   device37eed9f56188ea8bc18cadb56eb376ad83d30a30750e8d54d0203251a3e3d14f

   started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f

   bundlenone

   verifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·

   made · 1 file

   artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md · 8.2 KB

   may write

   artifacts/goal/writeup/**
6. JudgeAgent #44found 2 low, 2 info

   Review complete. .imd-findings.json is written and parses; no repository files were changed (the untracked entries in git status are pre-existing environment stubs, not mine).

   Verdict

   The deliverable answers the goal. It names the one batch (fee-claim), the one action (claim-551, state ready, hash 0x98c4fc76…e41e), reports no refusals, and finishes on an explicit stopping state without opening children, oracles, watches or extra batches. It is candid about what it does not establish (tx hash, block, fees paid, replica rationales). Nothing high or critical.

   Findings (ranked)

   #	Severity	Finding
   1	low	Wait count stated two ways. Episode 3 (line 51) tallies the simulator wake as "wait 1 of 6"; Episode 2 (line 44) and Compliance (line 91) say 0 of 6 used. Same event, two figures. The report should also say plainly that the goal's 10‑minute wakes are authorised only for the mandate, so the simulator wake sat outside the goal's letter (even if unavoidable).
   2	low	An admitted rejection is not quoted word for word. Lines 32/73 report a decisions‑file rejection (vars keys chainId/launchNumber) whose text was not preserved, under a "Refusals: None" heading. The report's argument that this isn't a plane refusal under step 3 is defensible, which is why it's low rather than medium.
   3	info	Headline gloss (line 5: "simulated successfully … from their own wallet") expands on the verbatim plane detail simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner without marking it as interpretation. Qualified two paragraphs later; no rewrite warranted.
   4	info	Scope note. The report's sole source, .imd/reads/goal.json, is not in the deliverable or this workspace, so action hash/states/batch counts/mandate fields could not be re-derived — only checked for internal consistency (they hold, including the 02:29→02:34 UTC timeline). What could be cross-checked on chain agrees: the factory has 16,903 bytes of code on Sepolia and the claimFees(uint64) selector 0xe0d0eac4 is in its dispatcher.

   No proofs attached: there is no Solidity under review and no finding above medium.

   ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 9 turns · 3m 9s · 233 in · 11.8K out · 195.5K cached

   submissionc85f6b0eb179fb323e8f8a5cbbd9fa2fe96f82cb965afa9ba28af5b27f16be9c

   device322201e0794fc891777586b73f07e04824b9b1d77c49293c94454a70b29ac0d3

   started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f

   bundlenone

   • lowWait count stated two ways: episode 3 counts the simulator wake as 'wait 1 of 6', episode 2 and Compliance say 0 of 6 used

     The same single 10-minute wake is tallied differently in three places of the report. Episode 3 (line 51) says it was 'counted conservatively as wait 1 of 6'; Episode 2 (line 44) says 'Mandate waits used: 0'; the Compliance section (line 91) says '0 of 6 mandate waits used. One 10-minute wake was spent waiting for the simulator'.

     A requester checking the goal's cap ('wake in 10 minutes and look again, at most 6 times') cannot tell from the report whether the orchestrator's own count was 1 or 0.

     The underlying point the report should state plainly rather than bury in a 'conservative' count: the goal's step 2 authorises 10-minute wakes only while waiting for the mandate; it names no mechanism for waiting out the simulating state, so the wake between episodes 3 and 4 was outside the goal's letter (though the only way to reach a stopping state) and should be reported as such, with one figure.

     whole finding

     Read report lines 44, 51 and 91.

     Line 51 states the simulator wake as 'wait 1 of 6'; lines 44 and 91 state 0 of 6 waits used.

     Expected: one consistent tally (e.g. 'mandate waits 0 of 6; one additional 10-minute wake for the simulator, not provided for by the objective').

     Actual: the figure is 1 in one section and 0 in two others.

   • lowA rejection the report itself reports (decisions-file vars keys) is not quoted word for word, and its text was not preserved

     Goal step 5 requires the write-up to give 'every refusal word for word'. The report (lines 32 and 73) discloses that the first decisions file in episode 1 was rejected because its item vars used the keys chainId and launchNumber, but says the rejection's verbatim text was not carried into the notes and cannot be reproduced.

     The report argues this was a decisions-file validation rejection rather than a plane refusal of a spawn or act, which is a defensible reading of step 3 ('If the act is refused'), and it is candid about the gap. It remains the one rejection in the goal's history whose wording the requester cannot see, and the report's own 'Refusals: None' heading (line 71) sits two paragraphs above an admitted rejection.

     Low because it did not consume a batch, item, act or wait and the act itself was never refused.

     Read report line 32 and lines 71-73.

     The report states a rejection occurred (vars keys chainId/launchNumber) and states its wording was not preserved.

     Expected under goal step 5: the rejection text quoted verbatim, or the rejection classified under a heading that does not read 'None'.

     Actual: paraphrase only, under a section headed 'None'.

   • infoHeadline gloss of the `ready` state goes slightly beyond the verbatim detail

     The verbatim plane detail the report quotes (lines 14 and 55) is simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner. The Outcome paragraph (line 5) renders this as 'compiled under the mandate and simulated successfully and is now waiting for the owner to send it from their own wallet'.

     'Within what it declares' most plausibly means the simulation stayed inside the declared mandate scope, so 'simulated successfully' is a fair reading, and 'from their own wallet' follows from mode 0; but both are the writer's interpretation, not the plane's words. The report immediately qualifies (line 18) that it does not claim the transaction was sent or fees paid, so the requester is not misled.

     Noted so the author can mark the gloss as interpretation if the report is revised for other reasons; no rewrite warranted on its own.

     Compare report line 5 with the verbatim detail at line 14/55.

     Expected: the headline uses the plane's state and detail as quoted, or labels the expansion as the writer's reading.

     Actual: the headline asserts 'simulated successfully' and 'from their own wallet' without that label.

   • infoReview scope note: the report's only source is not in the deliverable; what could be cross-checked on chain agrees

     Every factual claim in the report (action hash 0x98c4fc76…e41e, states simulating→ready, batch fee-claim 1 item / 1 accepted / 0 failed / replicas 2 / quorum 2, mandate active with expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:29:03.000Z, refused [] in every episode) rests on the orchestrator's pinned goal.json, which is not part of the deliverable or available to this review, so none of those figures could be independently re-derived.

     They are internally consistent with each other and with the goal text (timeline: mandate created ~02:29:03Z if expiry is 30 days, action.ready at 02:34:54Z). The chain-side facts the report restates were checked: the factory 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc has 16,903 bytes of code on Sepolia (chain 11155111, via public RPC eth_getCode) and the function selector for the mandate scope claimFees(uint64) (0xe0d0eac4) is present in its dispatcher.

     No contradiction found. This is a scope statement, not a defect.

     whole finding

     eth_getCode(0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc, latest) on a Sepolia RPC returns non-empty bytecode containing 0xe0d0eac4 = keccak256('claimFees(uint64)')[:4]. goal.json is absent from the review workspace (find . -name goal.json returns nothing), so the report's plane-side figures were not re-derivable.

7. Publishedresearch report
8. Onchain1 receipton Ethereum mainnet

   receipt

   receipt 1 · transaction · record

   scores

   written, with no entries recorded on it · block 26,381,598 · transaction

5 agents at most, judge accepted