Owner-action test (mode 0) on Sepolia: five machines, one treasury top-up

1. Round 1top-up1 of 1 back

   Agent #402 planned it. Started 2 min after the job was posted.

   what top-up was asked

   Read the native ETH balance of each of these accounts at the block .imd/reads/chain.json pins (its accounts give them; or eth_getBalance at exactly that block, never latest): 0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff, 0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9, 0xfff9976782d46cc05630d1f6ebab18b2324d6b14. For each account, in exactly that order, whose balance is below 50000000000000000 wei (0.05 ETH), add one move {"asset":"native","to":"<that account>","amount":"10000000000000000"}. Skip every account at or above it. Write, as your whole result, one asset-intent@1 and nothing else: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":11155111,"kind":"treasury.rebalance","moves":[<the moves>],"approvals":[],"rationale":"<each account's balance in wei at the pinned block, and which you topped up>"} Addresses in lowercase, amounts as decimal strings of wei, the moves in the order the accounts are listed above.

   the whole memo

   Episode 1: goal.json shows no prior batches, actions, refusals, handed results, requester notes, or listed mandates. The item budget is 12, with 0 used before this decision; the goal allows 14 episodes. This decision requests only top-up: exactly one item, five independent replicas, acceptance quorum 4, Sepolia chainId 11155111, pin head, and the three accounts in the objective in their stated order. The brief is copied verbatim from the objective. The plane will pin the shared block; no balances have been read or inferred here. The first batch uses five replica seats if accepted, leaving room for the sole permitted five-replica replacement. Progress counters: mandate waits scheduled 0 of 6; mandate waits completed 0 of 6; actions attempted none; action refusals none; replacement top-up-2 not requested. Wake on top-up settlement. This batch-settlement wake is not a mandate wait. If an earlier event wakes the goal, inspect current state and continue waiting for top-up to settle without creating another batch or acting early. Next episode: verify top-up is settled under goal.json withheld; its files are deliberately withheld and need not be requested. Then check goal.json mandates for 0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97 with state active. Only once that condition holds, propose exactly one act: {"name":"top-up-1","intents":"top-up","mandate":"0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97","quorum":3}. Until the mandate is active after settlement, schedule a wake with afterMinutes 10, look again, and keep the scheduled/completed wait counts in notes; at most six such waits are allowed. Finish after the sixth wait. Record each action name, state and hash exactly as reported; never invent a hash. Preserve every refusal word for word in notes for the write-up. If top-up-1 is refused specifically because an item intent has too few counted holders, request top-up-2 once, using exactly the same brief, one item, intents true, replicas size 5/quorum 4, and the same chain configuration with pin head. After top-up-2 settles and the specified mandate is active, act exactly once with name top-up-2, intents top-up-2, mandate 0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97, quorum 3. Do not blindly retry either act. Any other refusal ends the goal; a second action refusal ends the goal. Finish as soon as an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, or after the second refusal or sixth wait. The final write-up must include every action name, state and hash and every refusal verbatim. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, and spawn no batch other than top-up and the conditionally permitted top-up-2.

   1 step

   top-up, item by item

2. Round 2Episode 2: top-up already exists with exactly one item and replicas size 5/quorum 4.

   Agent #1743 planned it.

   the whole memo

   Episode 2: top-up already exists with exactly one item and replicas size 5/quorum 4. Its Sepolia chain read is complete at block 12101796, hash 0xce744202e52a28717afd3c0516b383e686e6efe0da8956345cd772c201ef4ab4. The effect.snapshot wake reports that read finishing; it does not establish batch settlement. Both batches and withheld explicitly report settled false. The item counts are total 1, running 1, accepted 0, failed 0, waiting 0. No results were handed to this episode. The specified mandate 0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97 is listed as active on chain 11155111, mode 0, quorum 3, expiring 2026-12-10T02:52:57.000Z. Its displayed scope lists a claimFees(uint64) target; the reference says recipients and allowances are not shown, so this display does not establish the outcome of compiling a treasury intent. No action has been attempted or refused, and no action state or action hash exists to report. There are no requester notes or refusals. The plane reports items used 1 of 12; this is episode 2 of at most 14. Decision: keep the existing top-up running and wake on its settlement. Request no new batch, action, result, cancellation, child, oracle question or watch. The goal remains unfinished because the required action cannot be proposed until the intent batch settles. This batch-settlement wake is not a mandate wait. Progress counters remain mandate waits scheduled 0 of 6, mandate waits completed 0 of 6, actions attempted 0, action refusals 0; top-up-2 has not been requested. Next episode: check the current batches and withheld settlement flags, mandates, actions and refused entries. If top-up is still running, continue waking on its settlement without duplicating it or acting early. Once top-up settles and the specified mandate is active, propose exactly once: {"name":"top-up-1","intents":"top-up","mandate":"0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97","quorum":3}. Its intent files are deliberately withheld and need not be requested. If the mandate is absent or inactive after settlement, wake afterMinutes 10 and check again, recording scheduled and completed waits; allow at most six such waits and finish after the sixth. If top-up-1 is refused specifically because an item's intent has too few counted holders, the only permitted replacement is top-up-2, requested once with exactly one item, intents true, replicas {"size":5,"quorum":4}, chain {"chainId":11155111,"pin":"head","accounts":["0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff","0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9","0xfff9976782d46cc05630d1f6ebab18b2324d6b14"]}, JSON output, and the item's instructions copied word for word from the objective. After that replacement settles and the mandate is active, propose exactly once: {"name":"top-up-2","intents":"top-up-2","mandate":"0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97","quorum":3}. Any other refusal ends the goal; the second refusal ends the goal. Never retry an act blindly. Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, or after the second refusal or sixth mandate wait. Preserve every refusal word for word and each action's reported name, state and hash for the write-up; never infer or fabricate a hash. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, and spawn no batch beyond top-up and the conditionally permitted top-up-2.

   1 step

3. Round 3Episode 3: goal.json shows top-up settled (batches[].settled true, withheld[].settled true) with items total 1, accepted 1, failed 0, running 0, waiting 0; repl…

   Agent #1842 planned it.

   the whole memo

   Episode 3: goal.json shows top-up settled (batches[].settled true, withheld[].settled true) with items total 1, accepted 1, failed 0, running 0, waiting 0; replicas size 5/quorum 4; Sepolia chain read complete at block 12101796, hash 0xce744202e52a28717afd3c0516b383e686e6efe0da8956345cd772c201ef4ab4. Its intent files are deliberately withheld and were not requested. The specified mandate 0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97 is listed under mandates with state active, chainId 11155111, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:52:57.000Z. Its displayed scope shows only a claimFees(uint64) target on 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc; the reference says recipients and allowances are not displayed, so this does not predict whether the treasury.rebalance intents compile. actions is empty, refused is empty, no wakes handed, no requester notes, no results handed. Items used 1 of 12; this is episode 3 of at most 14. Decision: both conditions of step 2 of the objective now hold (top-up settled, mandate active), so this episode proposes exactly one action: {"name":"top-up-1","intents":"top-up","mandate":"0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97","quorum":3}. No batch spawned, no cancel, no read, no child, no oracle question, no watch. Wake with afterMinutes 60 as a fallback; the reference says every action state change wakes the goal, so the next episode should normally start sooner on an action wake. The goal is not finished: no action state exists yet to report. Progress counters: mandate waits scheduled 0 of 6; mandate waits completed 0 of 6 (none were needed, the mandate was active once top-up settled); actions attempted 1 (top-up-1, proposed this episode); action refusals 0; replacement top-up-2 not requested. Next episode: read goal.json actions and refused. (a) If actions lists top-up-1 with state simulating, wait for it: wake afterMinutes 30 with no new decisions, and record its name, state and hash as reported. (b) If top-up-1 is in state simulated, ready, approved, sent or confirmed, set finish true; the write-up must give its name, state and hash exactly as goal.json reports them, never an inferred hash, plus the batch facts above. (c) If top-up-1 is in state flagged, denied, failed or expired, or refused lists the act, copy the refusal or the why word for word into notes. If and only if that text says an item's intent has too few counted holders (or words to that effect about distinct holders counting), spawn top-up-2 exactly once: name top-up-2, intents true, replicas {"size":5,"quorum":4}, chain {"chainId":11155111,"pin":"head","accounts":["0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff","0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9","0xfff9976782d46cc05630d1f6ebab18b2324d6b14"]}, output json, exactly one item (key top-up, vars {}), brief copied word for word from the objective's item instructions (the same text as the top-up brief). Wake on top-up-2 settlement. Once top-up-2 settles and the mandate is still active, act exactly once: {"name":"top-up-2","intents":"top-up-2","mandate":"0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97","quorum":3}. Any other refusal reason: finish and write it up word for word. A second refusal of any kind: finish. Never retry an act blindly. (d) If the refusal is marked outage true, it does not count: make the same act decision again once. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, spawn no batch beyond the conditionally permitted top-up-2.

   1 step

4. Round 4Episode 4: goal.json reports this action exactly: {"hash":"0xa90e301a8c61ab88de32480105d5d00d42ef9d0b8a633d1f720d2c92fc18e468","lane":"owner","name":"top-up-1",…

   Agent #668 planned it.

   It carried nothing out: it decided nothing while nothing was running.

   the whole memo

   Episode 4: goal.json reports this action exactly: {"hash":"0xa90e301a8c61ab88de32480105d5d00d42ef9d0b8a633d1f720d2c92fc18e468","lane":"owner","name":"top-up-1","kinds":["treasury.rebalance"],"state":"simulating","detail":"waiting for the simulator"}. top-up-1 was requested once in episode 3 and is still waiting for the simulator. The effect.action wake's outer state done describes completion of that effect; its result.state is simulating, consistent with actions[].state. It does not establish a completed simulation. No action is reported simulated, ready, sent or confirmed. The hash above is the reported action hash; no transaction confirmation or transfer is established. refused is empty: no refusal text exists to quote. top-up is settled in both batches and withheld, with one item accepted and zero failed, running or waiting; replicas size 5/quorum 4. Its Sepolia snapshot is reported read at block 12101796, hash 0xce744202e52a28717afd3c0516b383e686e6efe0da8956345cd772c201ef4ab4. No intent results were handed to this episode; none need to be requested. Mandate 0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97 remains active on chain 11155111, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:52:57.000Z. No requester notes were supplied. effects.pending is 0, but the action itself remains simulating. The plane reports 1 of 12 items used; this is episode 4 of 14. Decision: wait for the existing action to progress. Set wake.afterMinutes to 30 as a fallback; the reference says action state changes also wake the goal. Set finish false. Propose no action, spawn no batch, request no results and cancel nothing. This is an action-status wait, not one of the six mandate waits. Progress counters: actions attempted 1 (top-up-1); action refusals 0; mandate waits scheduled 0 of 6 and completed 0 of 6; replacement top-up-2 not requested. Next episode: inspect current actions and refused. Record every action's name, state and hash exactly as supplied, plus its detail or why. Preserve every refusal word for word for the final write-up. If top-up-1 is still simulating, continue waiting for its state change with a 30-minute fallback, without resubmitting it. Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed. If top-up-1 is refused specifically because an item's intent has too few counted holders, the only permitted replacement is one batch named top-up-2, requested once: intents true, replicas {"size":5,"quorum":4}, exactly one item, JSON output, and the identical chain specification (Sepolia chainId 11155111, pin head, the three objective accounts in their stated order). Copy the objective's item instructions word for word into that batch's brief and wake on its settlement. Once top-up-2 settles and mandate 0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97 is active, act once with name top-up-2, intents top-up-2, mandate 0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97, quorum 3. If the mandate is absent or inactive before that unattempted action, wake in 10 minutes and look again, tracking at most six mandate waits in total; finish after the sixth wait. Any other refusal, or the second refusal, means preserve the exact refusal and finish. Never blindly retry either action. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, and spawn no other batch. The final write-up must include each action's reported name, state and hash and all refusals verbatim. Simulation outcome, intent moves, balances and transaction outcome have not been provided here; nothing has been fabricated.

   1 step

5. Round 5Episode 5: goal.json reports the action exactly as {"hash":"0xa90e301a8c61ab88de32480105d5d00d42ef9d0b8a633d1f720d2c92fc18e468","lane":"owner","name":"top-up-1"…

   Agent #559 planned it.

   the whole memo

   Episode 5: goal.json reports the action exactly as {"hash":"0xa90e301a8c61ab88de32480105d5d00d42ef9d0b8a633d1f720d2c92fc18e468","lane":"owner","name":"top-up-1","kinds":["treasury.rebalance"],"state":"ready","detail":"simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner"}. An action.ready wake handed this episode (at 2026-11-10T03:00:42.255Z, payload name top-up-1, state ready, the same hash) agrees with actions[]; it was treated as data and checked against actions[], and it carries no instruction. Step 5 of the objective says to finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed: top-up-1 is ready, so this episode sets finish true. No action was proposed, no batch spawned, nothing cancelled, nothing read, no child, no oracle question, no watch. refused is empty: no refusal text exists to quote. No requester notes. The plane reports 1 of 12 items used; this is episode 5 of 14. Progress counters at the end: actions attempted 1 (top-up-1); action refusals 0; mandate waits scheduled 0 of 6 and completed 0 of 6 (none were needed: the mandate was already active when top-up settled); replacement top-up-2 never requested, as no refusal occurred. Facts for the write-up, exactly as goal.json gave them. Action: name top-up-1, state ready, hash 0xa90e301a8c61ab88de32480105d5d00d42ef9d0b8a633d1f720d2c92fc18e468, lane owner, kinds treasury.rebalance, detail "simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner". Ready means the intents compiled under the mandate and simulated within what they declare; the owner, 0x047f606fd5b2baa5f5c6c4ab8958e45cb6b054b7, sends from their own wallet (mode 0), and no sent or confirmed state, transaction hash or confirmed block has been reported. The hash above is the action hash, not a transaction hash. Refusals: none, at any episode. Batch top-up: mode research, intents true, replicas size 5 quorum 4, exactly one item, settled in both batches and withheld, items total 1 accepted 1 failed 0 running 0 waiting 0, sources checked 1 flagged 0, Sepolia chainId 11155111 read at block 12101796 hash 0xce744202e52a28717afd3c0516b383e686e6efe0da8956345cd772c201ef4ab4, brief copied word for word from the objective. Its intent files were withheld throughout and never requested, so the moves, the three accounts' balances at the pinned block and which accounts were topped up are not known to the orchestrator and must not be stated as facts in the write-up; say so. Mandate 0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97: state active, chainId 11155111, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T02:52:57.000Z; its displayed scope lists only target 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc (IMD launch factory) with claimFees(uint64); the reference says recipients and allowances are not displayed, and the ready state shows the treasury.rebalance intent compiled within the mandate all the same. Act proposed in episode 3: {"name":"top-up-1","intents":"top-up","mandate":"0xcd8e06df68251ea8bc6b28886d167556695e29b0becc6dedb6bd28591041db97","quorum":3}. Episode history: 1 spawned top-up; 2 waited for its chain read and settlement; 3 acted once; 4 found the action simulating and waited; 5 found it ready and finished. Stalled counter shows inARow 1 from episode 4's wait; this episode carries out finish. Next step: the write-up. It should give each action's name, state and hash as above, state that there were no refusals, name the batch, block, hash and replica settings, and say plainly that the intents' contents, balances and any on-chain outcome were not handed to the orchestrator. If the plane nonetheless runs another episode instead of the write-up, inspect actions: if top-up-1 is sent or confirmed, record the new state and the confirmed block as reported and finish again; if it is denied, failed or expired, copy its why word for word into notes and finish, since the objective's finish condition was already met at ready and no retry is permitted; spawn nothing, act again on nothing, open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches.

   1 step

6. Write-upAgent #1489made 1 file

   The report is written and checked. Nothing else is needed.

   Deliverable: artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md, 10,608 bytes of valid UTF-8 Markdown, left untracked in Git.

   What it says, from the goal's records:

   • Action top-up-1 reached state ready with action hash 0xa90e301a8c61ab88de32480105d5d00d42ef9d0b8a633d1f720d2c92fc18e468. The plane's detail was "simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner". The earlier simulating state and its detail are quoted too.
   • Refusals: none at any episode, so top-up-2 was never spawned and no mandate waits were used.
   • Batch top-up: one item, five replicas with quorum 4, Sepolia block 12101796 and its hash, settled with one accepted and zero failed, withheld throughout. The brief is quoted verbatim.
   • Mandate 0xcd8e…db97: active, mode 0, quorum 3, expiring 2026-12-10, with its displayed scope and the reference's caveat that recipients and allowances are not shown.
   • Timeline of the five episodes and the final counters.

   Gaps stated plainly in the report: the intents' contents, balances and which accounts were topped up were withheld and are not asserted. No sent or confirmed state or transaction hash was reported. The final goal.json handed for the write-up lacks actions and mandates sections, so the action facts come from the episode 4 and 5 notes that quoted goal.json verbatim. No code was built, so there is no trunk to name.

   ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 8 turns · 2m 25s · 194 in · 7K out · 253.6K cached

   submissionace9395f76d43f4aae748197cd6bc473c3dd1a0975bfd9bdf7e4b0aea0a0c0e9

   device1731fbfe0c4574fb6e59405e92715a96ebaf28ae80246f080a0c3368e4023bf8

   started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f

   bundlenone

   verifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·

   made · 1 file

   artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md · 11 KB

   may write

   artifacts/goal/writeup/**
7. JudgeAgent #296found 2 low, 1 info

   Review complete. .imd-findings.json is written and valid (3 findings: 2 low, 1 info); no repository files were changed and the report's SHA-256 still matches c31daee4…57ff5.

   Summary

   No high or critical findings. The deliverable answers the goal's write-up requirement in full: action name top-up-1, last state ready, action hash 0xa90e…8468, refusals none, top-up-2 never needed, no children/oracles/watches/other batches. Its narrative is internally consistent (episode table matches prose; counters agree), and it is candid about what it did not have (intent contents withheld, final goal.json lacking actions/mandates/wakes sections, no sent/confirmed state).

   External spot-checks that held (via ethereum-sepolia-rpc.publicnode.com):

   • Sepolia block 12101796 hash is 0xce744202e52a28717afd3c0516b383e686e6efe0da8956345cd772c201ef4ab4, exactly as the report states.
   • Block timestamp is 2026-11-10T02:52:00Z; the mandate expiry 2026-12-10T02:52:57Z (30 days after creation) and the action.ready wake at 03:00:42Z fit that timeline, including episode 1 showing no mandate and episode 2 showing it active.

   Findings recorded:

   1. Low — The "does not know" section treats the balances and expected moves as unknowable, but they follow from public chain state at the report's own pin: balances at block 12101796 are 0 / 0 / 193282237861185742953727 wei, so a correct intent has exactly two 0.01 ETH moves (to 0xb7a8…, 0xbe11…), 0.02 ETH total. The owner who must sign under mode 0 gets no check value from the write-up.
   2. Low — The mandate section asserts the three-recipient / 0.05 ETH-per-day scope from the objective alone, while the only record it inspected (goal.json) shows claimFees(uint64) on 0x1721…00fc; the discrepancy is noted but reconciled only by an unsourced appeal to "the orchestrator's reference", and ready is offered as proof of something it does not by itself establish.
   3. Info — "Every step was followed as written" sits next to a spawn description that includes an output JSON field not in the objective's spawn body; harmless, but the claim is slightly stronger than the record.

   ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 6 turns · 3m 25s · 167 in · 8.9K out · 146.4K cached

   submission4641df8b6307f39981cda75e0d223021722cebee0fbb6258483b30aa6bc9221b

   device21644a133f76db30ff2aaf26d530052034e3699515bfd32c4fa804d8d475f049

   started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f

   bundlenone

   • lowSection 'What this write-up does not know' leaves out the pinned-block balances and expected moves, though both are public and derivable from the block the report itself names

     The report presents the action's content as unknowable because the intent files were withheld.

     But the item's rule is deterministic over public chain state at a block the report pins by number and hash (12101796, 0xce744202e52a28717afd3c0516b383e686e6efe0da8956345cd772c201ef4ab4). eth_getBalance at exactly that block on a public Sepolia RPC gives 0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff = 0 wei, 0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9 = 0 wei, 0xfff9976782d46cc05630d1f6ebab18b2324d6b14 = 193282237861185742953727 wei.

     So a correct intent carries exactly two moves of 10000000000000000 wei (to 0xb7a8… and 0xbe11…, in that order), 0.02 ETH total, within the mandate's 0.05 ETH/day. The owner, who must sign top-up-1 from their own wallet under mode 0, gets no statement from this write-up of what the ready action should contain, and no check value against which to compare the plane's simulation.

     This does not break the goal's required write-up (name, state, hash, refusals), so it is low, but the 'not known here' framing overstates the gap.

     whole finding

     Claim as written: the balances, move count and topped-up accounts 'are not known here'.

     Source it cites: none beyond withheld files.

     What the public chain gives at the report's own pin: POST eth_getBalance for each of the three addresses with block tag 0xb8a8a4 (=12101796) to https://ethereum-sepolia-rpc.publicnode.com returns 0x0, 0x0 and 0x28ee6a6f9f4ff1bd7fff (193282237861185742953727).

     Expected under the item's rule: moves=[{to:0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff, amount 10000000000000000},{to:0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9, amount 10000000000000000}], 0xfff9… skipped.

     Actual in report: no balances, no expected moves stated.

     whole reproduction

   • lowSection 'The mandate' asserts the mandate permits native ETH to the three recipients, but the only record it cites (goal.json) shows a different scope, and the report offers no source that reconciles

     The report states that the mandate 0xcd8e06df… 'allows native ETH only to the three listed recipients, at most 0.05 ETH a day' and that 'the ready state is the evidence that the treasury.rebalance intent compiled and simulated within that mandate'.

     The recipient/allowance description comes from the objective, not from any record the report checked; the one record it did check (goal.json's mandate entry) shows a scope of claimFees(uint64) on a factory contract, which has nothing to do with native transfers to three EOAs. The report bridges the gap with an unsourced appeal to 'the orchestrator's reference' saying recipients and allowances are not displayed.

     That may well be true, but as written the report cannot tell the owner whether the mandate they are about to execute under is the one the objective describes or a differently-scoped one with the same id, and it does not say so. 'ready' proves the plane accepted the intent under mandate id 0xcd8e…; it does not by itself confirm the mandate's recipient list or daily cap matches the objective.

     whole finding

     Claim as written: 'The objective describes the mandate as allowing native ETH only to the three listed recipients, at most 0.05 ETH a day.

     The ready state is the evidence that the treasury.rebalance intent compiled and simulated within that mandate.'

     Source cited for the recipient list and cap: the objective text only.

     Source cited for the mandate's actual scope: goal.json, which per the report shows target 0x1721d7ae9c2bba9be52a316578c91295605c00fc / claimFees(uint64) and no recipients, allowances or daily cap.

     Expected: either a record (mandate detail, plane doc, or the action's compiled summary) that shows the native-ETH recipients and 0.05 ETH/day cap, or an explicit statement that the mandate's scope could not be confirmed from the records handed.

     Actual: an assertion that ready suffices, with the discrepancy noted but left unresolved.

     whole reproduction

   • infoSection 'What the goal asked and what was done' says every step was followed 'as written', yet the spawn it describes carries an `output JSON` field the objective's spawn body does not contain

     The objective fixes the spawn body as {"intents": true, "replicas": {"size": 5, "quorum": 4}, "chain": {...}} with exactly one item. The report lists an additional 'output JSON' setting on the spawn. This is probably a plane requirement for intent batches and harmless, but 'Every step was followed as written' is then slightly stronger than what the report itself records; a one-line note that the extra field was needed and why would make the claim exact.

     No effect on usability.

     Claim as written: 'Every step was followed as written' followed by a step-1 description listing 'output JSON' among the spawn settings.

     Objective step 1 spawn body: {"intents": true, "replicas": {"size": 5, "quorum": 4}, "chain": {"chainId": 11155111, "pin": "head", "accounts": [...]}} — no output field.

     Expected: either omit the extra field or say it was added and why.

     Actual: extra field listed under an 'as written' claim with no explanation.

8. Publishedresearch report
9. Onchain1 receipton Ethereum mainnet

   receipt

   receipt 1 · transaction · record

   scores

   written, with no entries recorded on it · block 26,381,730 · transaction

8 agents at most, judge accepted