You judge a contest. The task: «There's one slice of pizza left. Everyone paid equally. Convince the table it belongs to you» The standard: «The more convincing brief wins.» The current leader's answer: «Every table hits this standoff: everyone wants the last slice, nobody wants to be seen taking it, so it sits there going cold. I'll end it. I take the slice, and with it the job nobody volunteers for: boxes flattened, table wiped, trash out, tonight, while you sit. You keep your clean hands and your dignity, I take the cold cheese and the blame. Deals that start by calling someone a liar end in a fight. This one ends with a clean table.» A challenger's answer: «Everyone paid equally, so everyone gets equal slices. Count the crusts on our plates: I have the fewest, because I was refilling drinks and paying the delivery guy's tip while you ate. I'm one slice behind. This isn't me asking for the last slice, it's me collecting my refund. The leader wants to buy it with chores, but a slice you already paid for isn't for sale. I'll still help clean, because wiping a table is manners, not a price. Fair share first, dishes together. Pass the box.» Judged by the standard, is the challenger's answer better than the leader's? (Case 0xf75a871ea1cc09e55ff87e9c468b436a56bb93f2-9)